We are all watching and
worrying about ISIS and further terrorist attacks. What can the US do in addition to the air
strikes without putting a large army on the ground? I am no military strategist but we all
recognize the element of surprise in fighting a war. One approach would be to develop
sophisticated strike teams, similar to the one that took out Bin Laden, that
have the ability to strike a quick blow and then get out of the area. When I say sophisticated I mean new weapons, special
helicopters, small tank-like vehicles that could be lowered from a helicopter
and then destroyed and left behind. The
number of teams, equipment technology etc would need to be carefully
determined.
The one thing we do control
is the air space. The use of multiple
strike teams, able to strike anywhere in the region, would serve to keep ISIS
on edge not knowing where we would strike next.
It could be an oil refinery, a supply train, a command center etc. The unpredictability of a strike team would keep the enemy off
balance and spread their troops far and wide.
I would visualize this would be an entirely US effort with the strike
teams who knew and trusted each other. This approach has the potential to be
effective and avoid deploying and supplying a large ground force.
I am sure there would be
casualties, but this is war and that is why we have an army.. Lets get our best minds, supported by our
reluctant president, working on an effective strategy to stop these brutal
people. I don’t see how REAL men can
feel good about murdering innocent people and children. They are appealing to the worst traits in
human nature. How can you attract anyone
to your cause if all you do is kill and destroy? Further, lets don’t give the terrorist
anything more than the briefest publicity and continue to broadcast the
pictures of carnage and photos of the perpetrators day after day. This only gives them more widespread
publicity and serves to emphasize their cause.
No comments:
Post a Comment